A heavily painted machine, and the first I
found, although not the first I'd seen, pretty standard 54mm/1:32nd scale
compatible machine. Not knowing much about motorbikes I can only obseve that
it's not a 'V-twin' although what that makes it instead is up for grabs, and
the knee-pads on the tank look a bit like some BSA ones?
Comparison with an unpainted machine, the
pink one I will wax-lyrical on in a minute, but for now you can see how it's
quite a detailed machine for its age compared with the machines posted on the Home Blog today (5th November 2018) where Pyro,
Teixedo, Reisler and later Atlantic
were producing machines with hinted-at engine detail, or imaginary engines!
The commonest form you will find these in
is a 'primary' coloured, colour-fast, soft 'unbreakable' or 'beach-toy'
polyethylene, usually with contrasting wheels and often without a rider, but we
see from that reference in the PW
'Special' that they were sold four ways;
500 - Motorbikes & Riders (2 types).
Unpainted only . . all unbreakable and removable riders.
500M - Motorbike Only.
501/2 - Riders Only (assorted 2 types)
All trade, per gross.
What any retailer would want a gross (144)
of motorcycles riders [without bikes] for is anyone's guess!
Another, with one of the riders, this is
the helmeted chap, the other has a peaked 'service-cap', of a rather squishy US
style, but I'm not aware of this being a US mould-share or copy and the machine
is very British in lines.
The listing given in PW's special is from an un-dated 1940's catalogue and it's not
clear which rider is 501 and which is 502,
but I favour this as the '2, due to seniority, the other figure
having sergeants stripes!
. .
. I first became aware of these about a decade ago, when working for JB, he got
a bunch of them in a mixed-lot from somewhere, and we didn't know who they were
by, but liked the look of them, and it happened that Mr. Morehead had come
round for a 'working brunch' and identified them as Airfix, heavily painted by a loon, with a spoon! [I made-up the
last bit!]
Anyway, JB asked me if I could clean them,
and I said "Yeah, sure, I'll take
them home and do it tonight". I can tell you it took three dips in
Nitromores (this back in the day when Nitromores would take the paint off a
car-body in 30 seconds and was worth using - now it's some 'elf-n-safety'
affected, watered down, oven-polish with no power to speak of!), and a hour or
so with a tooth-pick to get the thick khaki 'mud' off them.
Then, about four/five years later, I found
this at Dave McKenna's Birmingham show! I've since seen others and although the
catalogue in PW states "unpainted", and while most examples
are unpainted, it looks like either Airfix
or a retailer painted them at some point, with this thick gloss paint, and that
we'd stripped 'factory-paint' off a whole batch! Hey-ho!
As the paint matches some examples of the
early mounted (Horse Guard in service dress) and early 54mm figures (Airborne,
Japanese and Paratrooper), I think it probably was/is Airfix?
Three parts of the bike and both riders, as
[unpainted] riders are usually a different colour to wheels/motorcycle, the
fact that the painted one is the same colour as the bike he came with is
another sign that they were probably factory-/out-painted and then matched to
machines with the under-polymer colours unknown.
There is a variation of the helmeted figure,
with his goggles on his helmet, not his face, with the same pocketed tunic as
the Sergeant and without the Sam-Brown/cross-belt, whether this was dropped
early or added after the PW-referenced
catalogue is unknown.
Equally it may be that someone forgot to
include it in the catalogue listing, OR that the 'two types' are cap or helmet and that there was 'artistic'
variance within a multiple-cavity mould/tool?
My sample to-date (Nov.'18), whatever the
truth of the paint/no paint, I'm not stripping my one; just in case! But the
one I really like is the pink one . . .
. . . and I can't tell you how much I love
this toy - it looks like a fossil, dug from the pink sandstones of the Gobi
desert, painstakingly, with a hat-pin and a soft-brush.
By some series of quirks, from the similarly-coloured
plastic for the wheels and bike, some factory or home painting at various times,
some cleaning and/or weathering/play-wear over time, it has developed a patina
of 'antiqued' age you couldn't re-produce in a laboratory with the greatest
minds in the universe working on the problem.
This is one of the ten to try and save from
a fire! If it wasn't identical to the others in every way, you'd think it was
from another company and thirty-year's earlier!
Under the patina, the bike is a pale
pinky-flesh and the wheels a mauve-purple. The engine seems to have been gold
at some point and the patina is probably a sign of the vehicle having been a
darker-red with an unstable additive/colourant?
10th Dec. 2018 - Strangely (not! They're always following me!) a machine turned-up in Vichy over the weekend - a month after posting this - with traces of all-over gold paint!
10th Dec. 2018 - Strangely (not! They're always following me!) a machine turned-up in Vichy over the weekend - a month after posting this - with traces of all-over gold paint!
Signs of the front number-plate being
painted on the faded one, and a short-shot / miss-mould on the front number-plate
of the red one, I also noticed the mud-guard bar on the blue one has
gawn-missin'. . . I'll trim it off to make it less obvious at a glance!
A few more riders, all the same pose, they came together, so probably date from the same factory-gate batch, a later (?) stable pigment ethylene run, matching two of my machines, the red and silver exactly, the black a new colour.
A few more riders, all the same pose, they came together, so probably date from the same factory-gate batch, a later (?) stable pigment ethylene run, matching two of my machines, the red and silver exactly, the black a new colour.
The original image I used in a mixed
motorbike post on the 'Home Blog' when I was hedging my bets with a 'probably/possibly'
I think! Other colours seen in relation to these include a bright apple/grass
green and a subdued yellow.
So - I got them out and took the shot a few days later, but I'm not going to announce it on the home Blog, as I've posted a couple of links there (to here) in the last few weeks and I'm sure some people get sick of links to something they've only just read!
Therefore if you're reading this in December 2018 you're getting a 'sneak preview' of something I won't return to until something more substantial turns-up! Not that there's' anything new in it, just a nice picture!
Therefore if you're reading this in December 2018 you're getting a 'sneak preview' of something I won't return to until something more substantial turns-up! Not that there's' anything new in it, just a nice picture!
but perfectly fine at both ends, reaction to a PVC rider? Britains?
Added 2024, these are the findings of shows over the time since the last update (2018), but actually most were found in 2023 I think. But that's twenty-odd years since I discovered these, and it must be ten years since I wrote the relevant line above!
Again, signs of these having been factory painted (and if not by Airifx, by someone with a commercial bent), this being the third time, years and miles apart that they've come into my sphere, both blue plastic, with red wheels, underneath the paint, like the existing sample, so clearly a whole - matching - batch got the treatment.
All three figures as mentioned above, in close-up, the new one (here) is the red one with the goggles on the helmet and no Sam-Browne belt, so I suspect he's meant to be a civilian 'ton-up' kid? With two joining the fleet, they are looking to be as common as the other pair.
Just which pair was the catalogue referring to when it only mentioned two types? And why the discrepancy? Probably the art-department were shown all three but didn't register the differences between the two helmeted ones?