And they are unnumbered so we don't know if
you were getting most of two tool-shots, or a single runner-worth's of fourteen
products? I suspect the latter; it makes sense.
Presumably they were aimed at a market or
perceived market resulting from the May 1980 Iranian Embassy siege-break in
London, coupled with a bit of Falklands/South Georgia mythology.
The small scale ones would be advertised the
next year but never be issued - see section at end of post - below.
I shot these back in 2008 to shove on
evilBay at a 99p-start and I think most went for a couple of quid-each, with
the 'officer' maybe going to four-pounds-something? But it meant I had a set in
Piacasa with a less than common - for the Blog - background (I know some of my
backgrounds are a bit tired now!), it's all a bit sandbaggy!
They are not as rare as the used to appear
to be, and often turn-up in mixed lots, while a re-issue in the last few years
saw them in an awful troll-shit, purple-blue polymer which made them look like
some demented Middle-Eastern SWAT team . . . which may well have been the corporate-thinking
behind the choice of that colour!
The figures are wearing what appear to be
the (and would still have been in trials) Boot, Combat, High [ankle] or BCH, which weren't fully adopted until
August 1984, carrying a passable Heckler
& Koch MP5 submachine-gun (non-standard outside Hereford at the time,
the anti-terrorist police still relied on Stirling
SMG's or the odd M16), and they
all have a rappelling/tying-people-to-chairs rope looped round their body.
A stun-grenade (big bang, few fragments)
and a pistol (my father carried a Berretta
. . . well, actually he left it under his pillow for my brother and I to find!)
in its holster complete the weaponry, and they are wearing black-fatigues with a
tight hood (pull-cord) over a respirator with side-mounted (left) filter which
may be the standard for the time or the replacement S10 which as part of the Combat-80
upgrade also (like BCH, SA80, Kevlar Helmets . . . et al!) filtered into
service from the mid-1980's. It may be a non-standard piece, of course,
certainly the nose-protrusion is too long for either of the referred service
items.
They have thin leather gloves, and a four-magazine
pouch for the HK's and a larger pack
which seems to be the respirator case - in the infantry worn on the left hip,
where it constantly got in the way, especially when vehicles were involved,
these guys have their ammo-pouch there and have moved the respirator case round
to the small of the back where it's out of the way.
I suspect the jacket (or a 'waistcoat'
portion of it) had some padding/protection from fragments, but it would have
required flexibility not then available with the full 'flack-jackets' which
remained bulky and solid into the late 80's.
The irony is that the embassy siege was probably
the only time a unit of the SAS were deployed dressed as that, or these chaps,
while the guys operating in Northern Ireland would have worn a mix of standard
and aftermarket combats or smocks all made from the four-colour, regulation DPM
(disruptive-pattern-material) of the time.
Late Britains swivel figures, not very nice, and it's only the non-general service issue respirators which make them 'special forces' for the purpose of this comparison. They came with either the milk-chocolate helmets and pale 'aqua' uniforms, or lightly more realistically outfitted with UN helmets, and at one point the same scheme or one very similar was used with late mouldings of the Deetail WWII US Infantry.
In point of fact the webbing is also non-standard, but since these were issued off the back of the Falkland's Conflict and 'The Embassy Siege', most armies have adopted forms of pick-and-mix webbing or PLC (Personal Load-Carrying equipment), and they are almost more contemporary now (2020's), then when they were issued!
The earlier Britains Deetail, however, were somewhat more accurate, but nobody would wear a beret in combat! Also, they are much larger figures, and I've addressed some more points about this line, on the Modern infantry post.
The recent (2020's) reissues were in a rather insipid shade of sandy-fawn plastic, presumably to try and tie them into our pretty disastrous adventures in Iraq and Afghanistan, despite the uniform worn, being a dated, internal security getup, not used for decades, nor in either theatre.
●○●●○● ●○●●○●
●○●●○● ●○●●○● ●○●●○●
1984; [Cold
War/Modern]
S.A.S. (Special
Air Service)
9 01761 - 1:72 Scale (25mm)
Because it didn't exist except as a
marketing idea in a catalogue issued the autumn before the period to which it
pertains, there is no point in a separate entry for the HO/OO (or by then
'1:72' SAS set, so it might as well go here for those who persist in looking
for such stuff!
Advertised in the 1984 catalogue, it never
happened.
Had it; it would have been like the Cold
War US or Russian sets and the WWII Italians, i.e.; a rather boring selection
of multiples of six of the seven 1:32nd scale figures in sixes, sevens or
eights, scaled down, with - probably - two officers, and while Airfix had by
then adopted (or were about to) the 1:72 scale for packaging, they would almost certainly have
been issued in a size closer to 1:76th scale.
But it never happened and that's that.